Thursday, March 22, 2012

Forced flood turned farmland to muck

Debra Levey Larson-Illinois - Tuesday, January 24, 2012, 11:18

Deliberate flooding of the Mississippi River last May left deep gullies in more than 130,000 acres of Missouri farmland, displaced tons of soil, and damaged irrigation equipment, farms, and homes. (Credit: Lois Wright Morton)

U. ILLINOIS (US) — Deliberate flooding of the Mississippi River in May 2011 is expected to create long-lasting, if not permanent, agricultural damage to hundreds of acres of farmland, according to a new study.

When the river rose to 58 feet with a forecast of 60 feet or higher, the emergency plan to naturally or intentionally breach the levees, established more than 80 years earlier, was put in motion.  The flood of 1937 did top the frontline levee and water passed into and through the New Madrid Floodway, but being floodfree since then caused area landowners to oppose the plan being put into action.

“After a delay due to a legal appeal from area landowners, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was finally given permission by the U.S. Supreme Court to open the floodway, but by that time, the Mississippi River was 4 feet higher than planned for,” says Kenneth Olson, professor of crop sciences at the University of Illinois.


After the TNT blast in Birds Point Missouri, the land was covered with a thick sand deposit and new crater lakes were formed. (Credit: Lois Wright Morton)


Even if the fields of gullies are reclaimed, the soils are likely to have lower crop productivity. (Credit: Ken Olson)

Straight from the Source

Read the original study

DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.1.5A

“The initial additional force and depth of floodwater caused more damage to buildings and more deep land scouring than was predicted. The strong current and sweep of water through the Birds Point, Missouri breach created deep gullies in 133,000 acres of Missouri farmland, displaced tons of soil, and damaged irrigation equipment, farms, and homes.”

The rushing water gouged large deep gullies on parcels of land adjacent to the blown levees and on some distant fields. The land was also covered with a thick sand deposit and in some areas adjacent new crater lakes were formed.

“Reclamation efforts by the Corps of Engineers included patching the frontline and fuse plugs levees with the sand, and topsoil was trucked in,” Olson says. “The former 60.5 feet fuse plug and the 62.5 feet  front line levee was rebuilt, raising it initially to 51 feet and then, after input from local farmers, to 55 feet. Proper drainage in the area has been restored, but the unanticipated fields with large and deep gullies located five miles from the levee breaches will not be repaired very easily.”

Even if the fields of gullies are reclaimed, the soils are likely to have lower productivity.

“The resulting land surface will have less soil aggregation, less organic carbon, and be more sloping, making it difficult to farm the land,” Olson says. “Some of this lost cropland could be restored as wetlands and wildlife habitat adjacent to the patched levees.”

The findings are reported in the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

“Over the last 30 years, many soil and water conservation practices and structures were no longer used, and soil erosion standards were met using conservation tillage and no-till systems,” Olson said. “Most remaining terraces, contour farming, strip cropping, and waterways were effective. But many waterways were filled above capacity and were eroded by fast-moving water or had significant sediment depositions.”

Olson previously reported on the extensive ponding and soil erosion that occurred after the heavy spring rains of 2008 that drowned corn and soybean crops in Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.

At that time, Olson said that fewer soil conservation structures and retention ponds were being built and maintained than in the past, although in Missouri significant acreage of unprotected agricultural lands was converted to fish and wildlife use.

Olson recommended potential solutions to reduce the flooding impact on agricultural lands in flat watersheds with poorly drained soils, such as creating temporary water storage structures, changing the crop rotation in the upland to include more forages rather than row crops, converting more of the agricultural land to timberland or grassland that can use or store more water, and building higher and stronger levees that are located farther from the riverbanks to widen the river flow channel.

“It would also be logical to accept periodic levee breaks or stop using the floodplain soil for agricultural crop production. Instead the land could be converted to conservation use and restore the periodic water storage function to the natural floodplain.”

Olson and his colleagues Mike Reed and Lois Wright Morton contend that strategically placed wetlands, settling basins, nutrient filtering, and levees are effective management for internal control of water and sediment. They point to Sny Island Levee Drainage District as a model for what could be accomplished with additional effort.

“The Sny Island District has developed pioneering ways to reduce local flooding and decrease the sediment and nutrient loads being discharged into the Mississippi River,” Olson said.

But Olson adds that more than half of Sny Island’s $2 million annual revenue is spent on fuel costs to run their three pumping stations continuously during periods of high water runoff.

“As the price of fuel oil increases, high commodity prices will be needed,” he says. “One way to mitigate this treadmill is to build on the diverse habitat created by wetlands, sediment basin, and levees, and purposefully develop an economic tourism plan to increase the recreational use of this region.”

More news from the University of Illinois: http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/news

Read the full article on Futurity.org » Earth & Environment




You Might Also Like Our Friends' Posts



Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed for this story.


Get World Weather Post by Email: